Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 22:26
Run Duration307 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 244
89% 155 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 656
68% 535 Pts
64-Core 657
44% 657 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$1,089
Gigabyte(1458 376B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 181
Parallax 167
128% 169 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 159
Splatting 120
124% 136 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 126%
Great: 148%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 60 44 48 48 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 433
Write 290
Mixed 183
SusWrite 58.5
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 40.1
142% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 94.7
113% 202 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 EVO 1TB
153GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 144 103 85 98 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 469
Mixed 392
SusWrite 162
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 54.8
183% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 250
218% 325 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
464GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 920 437 438 438 438 440 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,538
Write 1,656
Mixed 1,263
SusWrite 518
279% 1,244 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 70.3
244% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 815
DQ Mixed 902
673% 896 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 208%
Great: 238%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$80
579GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 50 52 59 70 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 77
Write 82.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 54.1
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$90
660GB free
Firmware: NDP3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 117 110 117 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 142
Write 105
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 114
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V 500GB
439GB free
Firmware: 8105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 55.7
Write 59.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 71.6
38% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
912GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 90 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 77
Write 88.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 89
56% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
865GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 111 111 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 111
120% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.7% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 18.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 100 26.9" 1280 720 AUS27A6 XG27VQ
Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 2,399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $399

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $2,095
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback