Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E781

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E781 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB222
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130419
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '21 at 23:39
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2640M 12,152 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 49.1 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 125 50% 86.1 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 171 23% 171 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Fujitsu(10CF 15E9) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.1 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0509 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 342 Write 171 Mixed 190 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 12.3 53% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 57.6 60% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 70%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB 31,309 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 723GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 106 114 112 105 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 119 Write 102 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 105 123% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.3 170% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 65%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 11GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 15 14 9 8.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 25 Write 15.5 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 11.5 22% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2.3 130% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 11.3 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 8.2 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	24.1"	1280 720	DELA079 DELL U2412M

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical LIFEBOOK E781 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E781

CPU
Core i7-2640MIntelBench 54%, 12,152 samples	7x
Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples	3x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	2x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	10x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	2x

SSD
Ultra Plus 128GBSanDisk $75Bench 77%, 16,709 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x
Extreme 240GBSanDisk $200Bench 76%, 7,034 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	1x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	1x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 7% - Terrible

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16