Foxconn Flaming Blade GTI

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Foxconn Flaming Blade GTI (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn Flaming Blade GTI
Memory	2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '21 at 22:15
Run Duration	392 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 97 1-Core 67.8 2-Core 120 61% 94.9 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 295 32% 254 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43% Average	Lighting 60.2 Reflection 83 Parallax 52.3 49% 65.2 fps	MRender 62.1 Gravity 68.8 Splatting 0.2 31% 43.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 290GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 235 234 224 218 220 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 642GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.78% Terrible	Read 33 Write 28.6 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 11.8 6% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 7.5 25% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 800GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 168 167 166 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 166 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 164 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB 4,385 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 137 137 137 137 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 155 Write 157 Mixed 37 SusWrite 137 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 88%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB 7,970 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 27.3 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 11.6 18% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.8 258% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 98%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 31GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 22 20 21 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 19 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 20.3 31% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.7 179% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 39%
WD My Passport 07A8 1TB 5,659 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 804GB free, PID 07a8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 24.7 Mixed 24 SusWrite 11 29% 22.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 21.8 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 14 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 50.1 80% 50.1 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	13%	15	311	258	30	0"	2048 1152	LG QHD

History: Score 11: 2R 0G 1B | Score 6: 1R 0G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Flaming Blade GTI Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Foxconn Flaming Blade GTI

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	13x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	7x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	2x
GeForce 8600 GTSNvidiaBench 2%, 2,598 samples	2x

SSD
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	3x
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	2x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	2x

RAM
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	9x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	9x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16