Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190315
Uptime	11.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '21 at 00:31
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 137 2-Core 263 92% 164 Pts	4-Core 541 8-Core 744 81% 642 Pts	64-Core 666 41% 666 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37D2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.3% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 101 Parallax 103 88% 104 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 94.8 Splatting 87.9 83% 103 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,800 Write 833 Mixed 1,342 292% 1,325 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 62.4 170% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,480 DQ Write 1,221 DQ Mixed 1,356 1,014% 1,353 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 14GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 11 13 12 11 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 112 Write 56.5 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 13.9 71% 60.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.7 104% 2 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB 15,011 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70% Good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 21.4 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 22.2 SC Mixed 20.8 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	120	48.8"	1280 720	SAM7053 LC49G95T

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 106%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	275x
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	247x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	152x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	65x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	64x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	77x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	73x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	68x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $160Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	73x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $717

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16