Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics 10,893 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Memory 23 1-Core 32.8 2-Core 61.8 22% 39.2 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 114 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 261 252 262 262 261 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.8% Above average	Read 277 Write 254 Mixed 258 SusWrite 257 59% 261 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 30.1 95% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 65.4 DQ Mixed 45.4 36% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 123%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 9 7.7 9.4 7.7 9.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	7.79% Terrible	Read 26.6 Write 8 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 8.3 18% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0 28% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.79% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 2x4GB 5,366 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	9.64% Terrible	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.7 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 299 13% 299 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 9.64% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	205x
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 21%, 3,779 samples	102x
A6-6310 APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 33%, 10,893 samples	92x

GPU
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	202x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	102x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	94x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	54x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	25x
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 25%, 10,170 samples	12x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16