Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560x1080x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 17:32
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 870
90% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
ASRock(1849 5031) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.Q4
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 54.4
Reflection 60.2
Parallax 76.2
44% 63.6 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 44.1
43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 385
Write 122
Mixed 164
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 32.6
117% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 90.9
75% 107 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 79%
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
24GB free
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,635
Write 1,024
Mixed 996
269% 1,218 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 47.6
227% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 771
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 520
465% 699 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 228%
WD RE4 250GB (2010)-$33
4GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67
Write 66.2
Mixed 63.5
49% 65.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 79%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
459GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 154 154 154 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 127
Write 131
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 152
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
191GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 97 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 87.4
Write 95.3
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 96.9
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53%
Great: 107%
Adata HD650 1TB
171GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 131
Mixed 53.7
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 78%
TOSHIBA HDWD240 4TB
77GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 92 93 94 93 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
Read 190
Write 187
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 95.6
181% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 0.83 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30BESB.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 33.6
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 31.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $596
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback