Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 81.7 1-Core 69.8 2-Core 125 57% 92.3 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 177 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Taisu 120GB 120GB 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0809B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 30 28 25 27 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.3% Below average	Read 257 Write 207 Mixed 123 SusWrite 33.7 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 8.4 75% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 59.8 DQ Write 69.3 DQ Mixed 18.3 27% 49.1 MB/s

Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 56GB free Firmware: 0006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 111 109 106 105 103 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.4% Average	Read 256 Write 133 Mixed 167 SusWrite 108 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 12.9 70% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 76.2 72% 114 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 62%
WD My Book 1TB 10,299 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 915GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 24 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 23.8 Write 24.3 Mixed 23 SusWrite 24.6 33% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.8 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $280

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16