Asrock FM2A88M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150505
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 29 '21 at 04:00
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8550B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 106
45% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 105
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1315) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 7.1
4% 6.1 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 7.9
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
223GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1036 828 1090 1010 1001 1047 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,252
Write 355
Mixed 939
SusWrite 1,002
198% 887 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 71.7
236% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 414
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 317
253% 355 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 202%
Great: 236%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 16 15 53 65 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 58.1
Write 63.2
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 46.8
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
86GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 65
Write 62.5
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 67.9
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 42%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.4 7.4 3.7 4.9 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 19.5
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 6.9
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.4
132% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.4% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 10.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88M-HD+ Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ - $67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $323
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback