Asrock H61M-VS.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS.  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 10:12
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 154
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 310
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 380
26% 380 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 38.3
24% 32.8 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 32.4
31% 36.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27%
Great: 30%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SDVPSA181024 240GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 189 177 14 56 14 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.2% Poor
Read 213
Write 205
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 76.7
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 1.2
30% 9.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 0.6
6% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
57GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 90 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 99.2
Mixed 49
SusWrite 89.1
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 82%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
36GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 17 15 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 15.8
Mixed 17
SusWrite 16.8
24% 19 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.3
94% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H61M-VS. Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $118
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback