| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS. (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120315 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 10 '21 at 10:12 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
63.4%
Good
|
64% 108 Pts
|
40% 309 Pts
|
24% 380 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
24% 32.8 fps
|
30% 36.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SDVPSA181024 240GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 189 177 14 56 14 MB/s
|
22.2%
Poor
|
29% 130 MB/s
|
30% 9.2 MB/s
|
6% 12.9 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
57GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 90 90 90 89 MB/s
|
54.4%
Above average
|
62% 84.4 MB/s
|
125% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
36GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 17 15 16 MB/s
|
11.6%
Very poor
|
24% 19 MB/s
|
94% 2.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
39.3%
Below average
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
48% 84.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VS. Builds (Compare 92 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 11x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 10x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 9x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 8x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $97 |