PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 44.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8B75-V (all builds) |
Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121011 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Apr 09 '21 at 19:38 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Asus(1043 8509) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 8.1 87 68 29 MB/s
|
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
44GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 74 80 87 85 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
|||
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 29 28 MB/s
|
21.2%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 223x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 149x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 88x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 88x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 67x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 58x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $442 |