Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 09 '21 at 19:38
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$123
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 94.4
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 158
71% 114 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 231
30% 225 Pts
64-Core 231
16% 231 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340
Asus(1043 8509) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.6% Average
Lighting 52.9
Reflection 94.9
Parallax 58.4
43% 68.7 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 56
Splatting 52.5
47% 59.3 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 8.1 87 68 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 369
Write 327
Mixed 231
SusWrite 69.3
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 15.4
54% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 16.9
13% 18 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$134
44GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 74 80 87 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 86.3
Write 84.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 80.7
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 29 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 27.5
Write 28.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 27.4
34% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $546
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback