| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VS. (all builds) |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120910 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 06 '21 at 08:33 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
68.9%
Good
|
67% 114 Pts
|
45% 335 Pts
|
21% 337 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
18% 25.4 fps
|
19% 23.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2311006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 217 222 224 225 224 MB/s
|
52.8%
Above average
|
48% 214 MB/s
|
75% 27.6 MB/s
|
86% 142 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
931GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 190 190 191 190 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
105% 146 MB/s
|
162% 1.3 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17
2GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
31.5%
Below average
|
33% 24.6 MB/s
|
423% 5.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.2%
Average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
39% 13.8 GB/s
|
50% 80 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VS. Builds (Compare 92 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 11x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 10x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 9x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 8x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $96 |