Legend PLATINIX-2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemINTELR AWRDACPI
MotherboardLegend PLATINIX-2  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20030424
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '17 at 09:20
Run Duration1674 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 2.80GHz-$100
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Memory 36
1-Core 10
2-Core 16.4
16% 20.8 Pts
4-Core 12.9
8-Core 14.8
2% 13.9 Pts
64-Core 13.6
1% 13.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor 6L020J1 21GB
9GB free
Firmware: A93.0500 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 25.6
Mixed 24.5
19% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.25
62% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 19%
Maxtor 6Y080L0 82GB-$60
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: YAR41BW0 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 45
Mixed 38.3
33% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.29
79% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.5% Terrible
Read 20.2
Write 8.03
Mixed 9.75
14% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.39
58% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.5%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
3.64% Terrible
MC Read 1.1
MC Write 0.8
MC Mixed 0.9
3% 0.93 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 0.4
SC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.4 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback