PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T5600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5600 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190630 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 28 '21 at 21:21 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
56.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 6950-$290
MSI(1462 2460) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 430 436 436 408 351 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
Generic Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.9 8.9 9 8.8 9 MB/s
|
4.89%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
89GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 16 16 15 16 MB/s
|
11%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 4.4 4.1 4.4 4.1 4.1 MB/s
|
6.95%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron-002C 9KSF25672PZ-1G4M1 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
|
64.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 96x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 82x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 62x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 51x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 49x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $170 |