HP Compaq 6710b (KE207ES#ABZ)

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 72% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	HP Compaq 6710b (KE207ES#ABZ) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30C0
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080111
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '17 at 18:58
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	72%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T8100-$78 2,639 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 58 1-Core 16 2-Core 32 27% 35.3 Pts	4-Core 28.9 8-Core 30.4 4% 29.6 Pts	64-Core 31 2% 31 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 30C0) 384MB Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 17380440 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 -135411728906633 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1019 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 40 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 52 55 77313015860 (C2) HDA temperature 52 55 77313015860 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 17380440 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 17380440 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 17380440 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3647 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3648 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3648 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5274	32.7% Below average	Read 239 Write 112 Mixed 150 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 23.5 4K Mixed 12.3 47% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 47.9 DQ Write 35.2 DQ Mixed 23.5 22% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.93 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Compaq 6710b (KE207ES#ABZ)

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)