Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270P-D3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '21 at 02:54
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 504
51% 412 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (100 fps cap detected)
69.9% Good
Lighting 99.8
Reflection 100
Parallax 100
81% 99.9 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 100
Splatting 0.1
48% 66.7 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$102
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 212 225 209 189 207 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 361
Mixed 168
SusWrite 216
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 36.1
159% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 166
173% 284 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 120%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
315GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 469 453 471 478 438 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 484
Mixed 415
SusWrite 460
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 44.1
190% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 161
130% 189 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
568GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 469 454 471 477 439 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 487
Mixed 462
SusWrite 461
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 65.9
226% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 3D 2TB-$185
568GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 468 452 469 476 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 337
Mixed 300
SusWrite 452
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 46.4
172% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 274
226% 325 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 114%
Great: 118%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
58GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 196 187 196 196 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 250
Write 199
Mixed 153
SusWrite 192
260% 199 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 7.8
641% 8.83 MB/s
DQ Read 11.9
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 9.2
741% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 859B BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FD 029E CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.3% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 13.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270P-D3-CF Builds (Compare 2,428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $510
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback