Acer Aspire M7811

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M7811 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M7811
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100429
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '21 at 14:41
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 74.5 1-Core 82 2-Core 154 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 378 41% 324 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.4% Above average	Lighting 69.9 Reflection 73.8 Parallax 73.3 57% 72.3 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 70.7 Splatting 66.4 55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 174 185 185 184 178 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60% Above average	Read 237 Write 224 Mixed 210 SusWrite 183 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 45.5 4K Mixed 29.3 98% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 196 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 124%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 931GB free Firmware: JP4OA3FE SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 123 124 127 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 131 Write 132 Mixed 66.4 SusWrite 124 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 74%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 900GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 87 89 91 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 88.7 Write 84.6 Mixed 52.6 SusWrite 89.7 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 51%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 908GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 166 162 162 160 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 166 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 162 98% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 30 Write 23.2 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 23.4 33% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.9 203% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. None RM51264BA1339.16FD None BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. None M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.9% Below average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 10.2 28% 10 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M7811 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M7811

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	29x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	22x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	9x

GPU
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	8x
HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples	6x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 4x2GBToshibaBench 34%, 148 samples	15x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	8x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16