Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	19.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5400-$75 14,795 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 47.7 1-Core 9.7 2-Core 22.6 21% 26.7 Pts	4-Core 25 8-Core 27.4 4% 26.2 Pts	64-Core 28.7 2% 28.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240 1,218 User benchmarks, average bench 6% MSI(1462 809C) 2GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	5.17% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 9.1 Parallax 9.5 5% 8.13 fps	MRender 6.8 Gravity 6.2 Splatting 8.6 6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.17% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 31 38 23 83 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.6% Very poor	Read 101 Write 99.2 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 58 19% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 9.6 37% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 13.4 DQ Write 18.5 DQ Mixed 14.8 12% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	7.91% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 1.8 6% 2.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.91% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	15x
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	15x
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	12x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	12x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16