Performance Results

Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS G31T-M7  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '21 at 12:56
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 47.7
1-Core 13.4
2-Core 17.1
21% 26.1 Pts
4-Core 23.8
8-Core 20.8
3% 22.3 Pts
64-Core 24.5
2% 24.5 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240
MSI(1462 809C) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 9.5
5% 8.13 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 8.6
5% 7.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 31 38 23 83 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.6% Very poor
Read 101
Write 99.2
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 58
19% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 9.6
37% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13.4
DQ Write 18.5
DQ Mixed 14.8
12% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 1.8
6% 2.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.63 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical G31T-M7 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS G31T-M7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $89
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback