Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 12 '21 at 06:58
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 45.3
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 143
49% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 450
40% 338 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 15.8
9% 28.1 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 12.1
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 319 320 304 315 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 810
Write 280
Mixed 377
SusWrite 340
100% 452 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 17.6
77% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 425
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 379
284% 381 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 153%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
691GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 171 166 165 157 182 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 373
Write 266
Mixed 147
SusWrite 176
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 6.6
34% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 82.6
DQ Mixed 32.8
42% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 58%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
182GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 15 16 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 5
Write 13.9
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 15.9
18% 12 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.3
99% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.2% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback