Packard EasyNote_MX37-T-003

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote_MX37-T-003  (all builds)
MotherboardPACKARD T12C
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '21 at 14:28
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5250-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 46.6
1-Core 23.3
2-Core 42.3
26% 37.4 Pts
4-Core 45.6
8-Core 46
6% 45.8 Pts
64-Core 45.5
3% 45.5 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27%
Great: 37%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 66 75 39 27 15 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.2% Poor
Read 79.1
Write 80.9
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 42.6
16% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 12.6
49% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 36.6
DQ Mixed 34
26% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 128%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
11GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 11 11 4.6 4.3 7.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 5.8
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 6.8
13% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2
143% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.41% Terrible
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback