Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T1600
MotherboardDell Precision T1600  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 22:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 169
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 459
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
EVGA(3842 3655) 1GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 25.5
16% 22.2 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 20.9
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 184 170 148 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 389
Write 319
Mixed 295
SusWrite 156
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 26.7
90% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 143
116% 162 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
556GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 85 87 86 85 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 84.7
Write 56.8
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 82.9
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 57%
KUKA_USB 0000277822 V00 16GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 22 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 10.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 21.1
20% 17 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 578 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback