PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE (all builds) |
Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120326 |
Uptime | 14.4 Days |
Run Date | Mar 04 '21 at 18:59 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
AMD HD 7950-$290
XFX(1682 3220) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.9.2
|
29.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 140 67 60 26 27 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
26GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 9 9.2 3.6 6.4 2.5 MB/s
|
6.45%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
26.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 455x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 159x |
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 98x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 54x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $387 |