| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 870-195na (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 828A |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161104 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 28 '21 at 22:33 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.9%
Good
|
67% 118 Pts
|
42% 314 Pts
|
20% 330 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
HP(103C 82DF) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.07
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.4%
Poor
|
22% 29.8 fps
|
24% 29.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 362 402 415 50 28 MB/s
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
77% 342 MB/s
|
126% 46.4 MB/s
|
151% 228 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
594GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 165 166 167 167 166 MB/s
|
98.8%
Outstanding
|
96% 132 MB/s
|
133% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27%
Poor
|
27% 9.53 GB/s
|
14% 4.73 GB/s
|
44% 90.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 870-195na Builds (Compare 16 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 870-195na
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 15x |
| Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 12x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 1x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $201 |