Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190612
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '21 at 02:23
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 67.6 1-Core 152 2-Core 298 91% 173 Pts	4-Core 589 8-Core 1,132 102% 861 Pts	64-Core 1,465 91% 1,465 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 872A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Lighting 92.7 Reflection 91.3 Parallax 84.6 76% 89.5 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 80.8 Splatting 73.2 71% 89.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 238GB 2,635 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 139GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 94 54 49 50 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 449 Write 354 Mixed 356 SusWrite 79 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 19.4 64% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 97.6 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 115 90% 122 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 101%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75 71,106 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 67 73 70 74 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 104 Write 107 Mixed 54.6 SusWrite 65.8 61% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.9 247% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 2,513 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.8% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 24.5 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 23.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	506x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	484x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $154Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	361x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	241x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	110x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	67x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	99x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $596

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16