Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T3400-$70 2,721 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Memory 28.9 1-Core 24 2-Core 48.6 21% 33.8 Pts	4-Core 42.4 8-Core 43.9 6% 43.2 Pts	64-Core 45.2 3% 45.2 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400 634 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 82D2) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 3.2 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 0.5 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 49 47 26 54 46 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	22% Poor	Read 34.4 Write 57.5 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 41.8 30% 41.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 41%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 0GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.6 5.5 5.2 6 5.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9.49% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 1.7 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 5.4 9% 8.58 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.9 130% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.49% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	7.59% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 1.8 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 261 15% 261 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.59% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16