PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B79 |
Motherboard | MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) (all builds) |
Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191106 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 11 '21 at 17:30 |
Run Duration | 194 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
89.4%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 86 104 122 123 76 MB/s
|
80.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
66GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 69 68 68 MB/s
|
41.3%
Average
|
|||
Sony Storage Media 16GB
12GB free, PID 05ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.7 5 MB/s
|
4.95%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 1608
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.8 6.1 6.1 6.1 6 MB/s
|
6.43%
Terrible
|
|||
General UDisk 32GB
26GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 3.6 1.7 9.1 11 9.9 MB/s
|
9.47%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,392x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 684x |
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 328x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 283x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 280x |
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 272x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $487 |