| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | XMG P304 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Notebook W230SS |
| Memory | 14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150408 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 08 '21 at 21:25 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4900MQ-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
79.3%
Very good
|
78% 138 Pts
|
58% 455 Pts
|
32% 522 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 860M
Clevo(1558 2300) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
|
16.6%
Very poor
|
17% 19.1 fps
|
16% 20.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 378 381 294 281 282 MB/s
|
83.1%
Excellent
|
82% 363 MB/s
|
103% 34.2 MB/s
|
271% 362 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
61.7%
Good
|
61% 21.3 GB/s
|
57% 19.8 GB/s
|
57% 69.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P304 Builds (Compare 1 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: XMG P304
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $209 |