Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '21 at 09:59
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 86.6 1-Core 124 2-Core 264 87% 158 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 674 73% 579 Pts	64-Core 664 41% 664 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.6% Above average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 99.2 Parallax 60.5 54% 75.4 fps	MRender 62 Gravity 66.3 Splatting 63.4 52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 220GB free Firmware: MU02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 52 53 53 52 52 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 476 Write 406 Mixed 380 SusWrite 87.6 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 92.6 4K Mixed 41.5 150% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 245 204% 293 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 91%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB 87,883 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,420 Write 1,474 Mixed 451 247% 1,115 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 44.7 141% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 419 DQ Mixed 349 266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 277%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 2x8GB 1,960 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62.8% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 20.1 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 19.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	728x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	165x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	160x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	183x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	162x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	125x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	198x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	63x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $528

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16