MSI Z490-A PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C75
MotherboardMSI Z490-A PRO  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200722
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 06:36
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$144
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 281
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 890
89% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 234
Reflection 213
Parallax 206
191% 218 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 159
Splatting 141
134% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 157%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 484
Mixed 393
102% 460 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 54.5
180% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
542GB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 39
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 12.4
22% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
307GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 103 96 98 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 137
Write 134
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 99.3
72% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 38.5
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 12.3
23% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
225% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 92%
Seagate FreeAgent 1.5TB
212GB free, PID 3001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.8 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 35
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 8.7
33% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
WD My Book 500GB
6GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.3 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 34.4
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 9.3
33% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GXLZU320BSA 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 23.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z490-A PRO (MS-7C75) Builds (Compare 20,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z490-A PRO - $195

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $966
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback