HP p6580es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemHP p6580es  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100519
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 17:46
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5 650-$149
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 128
54% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 185
26% 187 Pts
64-Core 192
13% 192 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(1B0A 9045) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 305.93
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.3 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 14 17 16 18 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.96% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 12.3
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 17.2
8% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 7.96%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
29GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 7.7 4.4 6.3 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 29
Write 8.8
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 7.9
15% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.8
116% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 38%
ASMT 2115 640GB
431GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 20 19 21 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 20
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 20
29% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 13
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.4
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical p6580es Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6580es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $181
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $215Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback