Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AB350-Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '21 at 11:53
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 73.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 220 75% 136 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 699 71% 574 Pts	64-Core 928 57% 928 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3755) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.6% Excellent	Lighting 98.5 Reflection 105 Parallax 112 80% 105 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 98.1 Splatting 88.8 84% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GB 2,337 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 53 104 89 110 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 480 Write 103 Mixed 106 SusWrite 83.1 42% 193 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 85.5 4K Mixed 23.9 120% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 61.1 91% 178 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 79%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$23 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 362GB free Firmware: 35.25Q.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 47 104 104 105 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 92.5 Write 98.7 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 83.4 63% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 87%
SMI USB DISK 8GB 3,022 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 3.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	2.94% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 2.8 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4 7% 5.95 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.94% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x4GB 850 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 34.1 MC Mixed 30.9 98% 34.2 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 25.9 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	247x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	118x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	115x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	85x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	78x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	47x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16