Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KQ312AA-ABU S3422UK (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN Irvine
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '21 at 19:45
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4600 6,872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	21% Poor	Memory 33.3 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 53.6 23% 38.1 Pts	4-Core 51.8 8-Core 54.4 7% 53.1 Pts	64-Core 55.9 4% 55.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3450 4,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 1182) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0.4 1% 0.87 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79 6,615 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 309GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.CHN SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 57 50 19 17 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 35.5 Write 27.2 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 36.1 22% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	7.84% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2 6% 2.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 2.8 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 236 17% 236 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.84% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16