PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3397 |
Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120507 |
Uptime | 12.6 Days |
Run Date | Jan 09 '21 at 14:22 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
44.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.02V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 48 51 53 65 MB/s
|
41.5%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
41GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 131 118 117 128 126 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
SABRENT 480GB
80GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 18 23 14 19 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 2,454x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,454x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 790x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1,913x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 721x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 485x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $97 |