Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z87-D3HP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130417
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 29 '20 at 08:54
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 134
54% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 272
33% 253 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 52%
Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.5% Above average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 69.8
49% 66.8 fps
MRender 60.7
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 64.9
52% 64 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 60%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 5.9
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 246 256 239 213 262 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69% Good
Read 322
Write 154
Mixed 233
SusWrite 233
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 24.3
91% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 216
190% 284 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69%
Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
174GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 512 557 490 424 585 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 808
Write 690
Mixed 713
SusWrite 488
152% 675 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 43.8
138% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 451
DQ Mixed 536
398% 530 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 129%
Great: 372%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
5GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 53 76 61 40 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 284
Write 81
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 57.5
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 15.9
70% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 39.6
68% 140 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
55GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 111
Write 105
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 69.9
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 7.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $215
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback