Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 100% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	94% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 DESIGNARE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF (all builds)
Memory	56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '20 at 16:46
Run Duration	317 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 91.9 1-Core 123 2-Core 306 93% 173 Pts	4-Core 603 8-Core 1,124 103% 864 Pts	64-Core 1,570 97% 1,570 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 132 Parallax 134 96% 128 fps	MRender 95.2 Gravity 125 Splatting 111 91% 111 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 463GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1659 1363 1333 1302 1375 1389 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	324% Outstanding	Read 2,534 Write 2,376 Mixed 1,698 SusWrite 1,403 449% 2,003 MB/s	4K Read 61.7 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 84.8 279% 96.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,244 DQ Write 1,027 DQ Mixed 1145 855% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 324% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 463GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2319 1613 1627 1626 1626 1616 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	354% Outstanding	Read 2,595 Write 2,400 Mixed 1,835 SusWrite 1,738 481% 2,142 MB/s	4K Read 64.1 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 84.3 282% 97.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1386 DQ Write 1,142 DQ Mixed 1,262 946% 1,263 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 354% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 126 124 124 126 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 74.5 Write 107 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 125 70% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 228% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 115 115 117 122 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 76.5 Write 114 Mixed 66 SusWrite 116 68% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.5 201% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 90%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 3TB free Firmware: 2210 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 179 181 181 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 152 Mixed 79.8 SusWrite 180 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 97%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 128 130 131 134 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 104 Write 103 Mixed 79 SusWrite 129 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 201% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 92%
WD Elements 107C 3TB 3,265 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2TB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 139 139 139 139 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 134 Write 140 Mixed 87 SusWrite 139 170% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 10,311 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.7% Very good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 22.6 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 23.9 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 154%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF Builds (Compare 1,694 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 DESIGNARE-CF

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	960x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	285x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	108x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	106x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	104x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	97x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	165x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	137x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	89x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	46x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	44x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16