Asus P8Z68 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z68 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 21 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 192
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 500
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
Asus(1043 8385) 1.5GB
CLim: 782 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 47.6
Parallax 31.1
22% 35 fps
MRender 43.2
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 29.9
26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 84 27 20 18 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 338
Write 80.7
Mixed 164
SusWrite 40
34% 156 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 12.9
60% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 23.5
43% 85.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 74%
WDC WD40EFAX-68JH4N0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 142 142 142 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 136
Write 146
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 141
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 1.1
36% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 0.9
3% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 38%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
301GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 71 93 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 85.7
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 76%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
735GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 132 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 84.7
Write 79.9
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 130
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 100%
WD WD7500AYPS-01ZKB0 750GB
42GB free
Firmware: 02.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 71.9
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 45.9
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0822 2TB
760GB free, PID 0822
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 62 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 75.2
Write 32.8
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 63.5
66% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 19
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68 DELUXE Builds (Compare 411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68 DELUXE - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $766
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback