Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS XTREME
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF (all builds)
Memory	22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181108
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '20 at 21:44
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 149 2-Core 298 100% 181 Pts	4-Core 575 8-Core 946 93% 761 Pts	64-Core 1,580 98% 1,580 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3706) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2042 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.3% Very good	Lighting 97.1 Reflection 127 Parallax 81.2 79% 102 fps	MRender 91.4 Gravity 101 Splatting 98.6 80% 97 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 492 Write 422 Mixed 341 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 36.6 129% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 310 239% 326 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 340GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 177 177 177 178 178 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 131 Write 134 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 178 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 2.7 455% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 112%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 611GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 134 132 134 135 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 142 Write 141 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 133 87% 120 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.2 297% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 104%
Seagate Expansion+ 2TB 2,745 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 127 126 128 129 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 108 Write 124 Mixed 71.2 SusWrite 126 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.5 181% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 4000 C19 4x8GB 1,741 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 42.5 MC Write 46 MC Mixed 33.8 116% 40.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 48.7 SC Mixed 33.1 99% 34.8 GB/s	Latency 50.2 80% 50.2 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	62x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	38x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	23x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	25x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	11x
CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 18,655 samples	9x

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,059

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16