Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H97-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '20 at 16:54
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 221 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 601 53% 450 Pts	64-Core 601 37% 601 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.4 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 19.4 18% 19.5 fps	MRender 23.5 Gravity 21.5 Splatting 16.3 16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 309 249 259 223 243 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Read 385 Write 428 Mixed 298 SusWrite 276 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 93.1 4K Mixed 31 125% 49.3 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 179 156% 224 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 107%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 318GB free Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 389 341 251 240 251 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 393 Write 445 Mixed 362 SusWrite 308 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 34.4 134% 53.4 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 333 251% 337 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 99%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 879GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 150 149 153 153 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 104 Write 99.3 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 151 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 108%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 119 119 128 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 87.7 Write 110 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 119 71% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.8 207% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 65%
Seagate M3 1TB 2,563 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 83GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 96 89 73 79 69 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 55 Write 59.3 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 80.4 52% 70 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.9 243% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 64%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 9,084 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 690GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 41 42 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 39 Write 40.5 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 41.6 50% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.5 216% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 6,017 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 180GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 61 60 61 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 54.7 Write 59.8 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 60.2 69% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 10,062 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60.8% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 18.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 20.4 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	375x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	255x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	244x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	192x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	127x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	121x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	91x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	46x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16