Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 07:34
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$153
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 119
55% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 265
32% 248 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Asus(1043 04A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 45.2
29% 37.4 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 37
27% 32 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 38 71 76 77 64 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.1% Very poor
Read 5
Write 166
Mixed 125
SusWrite 71.9
21% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 9.5
30% 7.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 86%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
48GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 83.2
Write 83.7
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 87.4
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
149GB free
Firmware: V5DOA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 36 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 50.9
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 35.1
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
675GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 168 170 170 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 128
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 169
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 114%
External USB 3.0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0578
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 134 128 127 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 148
Write 170
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 131
175% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $411
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback