Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 161 70% 115 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 207 25% 194 Pts	64-Core 227 14% 227 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6870 25,443 User benchmarks, average bench 15% PwrHis(1787 2010) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	7.12% Terrible	Lighting 8.87 Reflection 6.23 Parallax 8.5 7% 7.87 fps	MRender 6.76 Gravity 7.93 Splatting 9.96 7% 8.22 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 7.12% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB 2,908 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 41 51 67 46 43 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.2% Poor	Read 127 Write 59.9 Mixed 82.9 SusWrite 51.1 18% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 11 48% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 11.9 DQ Write 16.1 DQ Mixed 13.6 10% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23 32,491 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 109GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 129 132 134 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 134 Write 131 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 133 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.7 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.4 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	11x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	6x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $233

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16