Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '20 at 21:32
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Phenom II X4 945
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 62
2-Core 125
57% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 224
32% 232 Pts
64-Core 241
16% 241 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 2GB
CLim: 1318 MHz, MLim: 1277 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 16.4
15% 16.5 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 18.3
Splatting 16.3
15% 19 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15%
Great: 17%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$47
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 140 97 133 137 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 158
Write 135
Mixed 153
SusWrite 126
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 19.8
56% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 93.2
DQ Mixed 37.9
35% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 83%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$128
586GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 155 154 155 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 111
Write 126
Mixed 55
SusWrite 155
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.3
418% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 112%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$11
26GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 21.7
Write 20.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 20.5
28% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
56% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.1% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $118
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback