Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 1095CD9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 1095CD9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '17 at 07:32
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 55.6
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 179
60% 109 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 610
58% 482 Pts
64-Core 914
56% 914 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 67.1
61% 72.8 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 72.3
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.8% Good
Read 267
Write 206
Mixed 217
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 33
111% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 92
92% 150 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 134%
WD WD3000BLHX-8 300GB
19GB free
Firmware: YA33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 144
Write 114
Mixed 115
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 3.02
4K Mixed 0.64
164% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 81%
WDC WD40 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 4TB
181GB free, PID 1562
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
Read 122
Write 113
Mixed 110
147% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.95
4K Mixed 0.28
112% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 52%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
87GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 89
134% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.21
82% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 55%
WDC WD40 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 4TB
69GB free, PID 1562
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.7% Above average
Read 150
Write 127
Mixed 86.7
148% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 3.27
4K Mixed 0.37
128% 1.59 MB/s
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
27GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 83.7
Write 85.8
Mixed 85.1
110% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.36
4K Mixed 0.26
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 55%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
22GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 25.5
Mixed 27.6
36% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.21
55% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 19%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
16GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 27.7
Mixed 6.68
25% 22 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.18
52% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 31.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback