PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150609 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 02 '20 at 19:26 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | PAK-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
|
68.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.1
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 295 296 294 293 287 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
26GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 11 10 11 10 MB/s
|
8.26%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 128GB-$13
19GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 18 18 17 17 MB/s
|
8.4%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,239x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,036x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 861x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 740x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 376x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 223x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |