MSI H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star H310 Gaming Infinite (MS-B915)
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28)  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180531
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 16:25
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 61%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 261
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 710
77% 597 Pts
64-Core 816
55% 816 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.4% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 66.1
60% 72.3 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 71
Splatting 0.09
57% 47.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 169 168 175 184 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 438
Write 277
Mixed 219
SusWrite 177
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 33.9
126% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 226
192% 283 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$71
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 168 177 179 194 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 164
Mixed 81
SusWrite 182
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99%
Great: 114%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 104
Write 71.5
Mixed 60.5
59% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 100%
Freecom MD Classic 3.0 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 6080
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.7 8.6 8.8 8.7 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 36.7
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 8.8
22% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
179% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 60%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 1405
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 66.7
Write 148
Mixed 111
82% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
221% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 90%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
626GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 37
Write 36.5
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 8.5
36% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 44%
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB
1TB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 34.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 8.5
36% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 74%
DMI External 165GB
77GB free, PID b136
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.2 10 17 16 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.87% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 5.5
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 11.7
14% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
22% 0.37 MB/s
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 2TB
2TB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.7 7.6 7.6 7.7 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 38.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 7.7
38% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
124% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 65%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
244GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 116 116 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 113
Write 87.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 116
127% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA400 2TB
720GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 1 1 1 1.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 38.2
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 1.1
35% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
114% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 58%
ASMT 2105 3TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.4 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 35.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 8.5
36% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28) Builds (Compare 1,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 (MS-7B28)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $515
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $280Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $115
Intel Core i7-12700K $380Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback