PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121101 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 12 '20 at 22:18 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
65%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 25 25 22 24 24 MB/s
|
72.2%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
271GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 92 99 102 102 98 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
127GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 86 85 86 85 MB/s
|
45.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 458x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 286x |
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 100x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 112x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 71x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 57x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $849 |