Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120413
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 14 '17 at 06:26
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 86
2-Core 168
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 285
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 62.3
57% 68 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 66
Splatting 56.2
52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
220GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 411
Mixed 420
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 36.6
134% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 99.5
109% 183 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 124%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 348
Write 193
Mixed 237
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 14
87% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 71.4
76% 128 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 95%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 136
Write 131
Mixed 115
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 83%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
50GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 15.7
Mixed 27.5
30% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.17
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.72
69% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 19%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 64GB-$8
47GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Read 33.1
Write 8.11
Mixed 4.2
14% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.22
4K Mixed 0.05
10% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.4
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback