Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190218
Uptime3 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 20:31
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 118
52% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 204
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 30.4
21% 29.1 fps
MRender 30.4
Gravity 25.3
Splatting 34.3
25% 30 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kodak X150 480GB
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 193 208 220 222 222 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 287
Write 296
Mixed 224
SusWrite 219
58% 256 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 29.5
122% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 152
135% 203 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 103 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 114
Write 129
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 101
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.7
226% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 2TB
96GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 25 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 24.9
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 24
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 44%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
9GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 6.1 8.3 7.2 9.6 9.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.07% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 18.6
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 8
18% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.M16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.4% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback