Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181218
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 04:08
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 208
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 607
59% 486 Pts
64-Core 737
46% 737 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8619) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 66.9
Parallax 63.7
53% 65.1 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 62
Splatting 60.7
51% 62.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 53.3
Write 180
Mixed 34.3
20% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 19.3
61% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 70.1
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 106
76% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
19GB free
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 64 22 96 70 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 306
Mixed 194
SusWrite 98.2
184% 250 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 15.3
2,431% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 145%
Great: 160%
WD Elements SE 25FE 1TB
446GB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 31.8
Write 33.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 33.7
44% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
163% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 67%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
4.38% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 2.7
7% 6.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.38%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 16GB
2134, 2134 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 23.4
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $191
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback