Asus P8B75-M LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-M LX (all builds)
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140806
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '20 at 14:08
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 87.9 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 207 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 463 46% 378 Pts	64-Core 481 30% 481 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440 14,286 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	3.87% Terrible	Lighting 4.87 Reflection 5.81 Parallax 4.06 4% 4.91 fps	MRender 5.62 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 3.52 4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.87% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 191 191 190 191 192 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 151 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 189 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 272GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 72 71 71 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 76.7 Write 60.7 Mixed 46 SusWrite 71.5 47% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 67%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70 66,332 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 91 123 125 124 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 101 Write 143 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 110 69% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2 371% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 111%
JMicron Generic 1TB 376 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 284GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 142 142 143 142 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 165 Write 152 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 141 184% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 141% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 222%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 23GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 7.2 6.4 6.2 6.4 5.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 21.8 Write 1 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 5.8 7% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 16GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 8.8 12 13 8.3 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 23.2 Write 15.2 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 11.6 21% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.2 129% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 1x8GB 2,012 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.77 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	179x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	158x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	104x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	80x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	32x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	37x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	29x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16