Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 26.8 1-Core 34.9 2-Core 79.7 26% 47.1 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 90 17% 119 Pts	64-Core 95 6% 95 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E8B 0101) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7989 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.43 2% 1.86 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128G 128GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0521A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 88 48 57 58 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 310 Write 247 Mixed 276 SusWrite 95.3 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 8.2 42% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 98.4 DQ Mixed 37.7 47% 84.1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 4.1 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 2.9 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 274 15% 274 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	28x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	2x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	29x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	5x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	2x

SSD
ShanDianZhe-256GB 256GBBench 59%, 101 samples	3x
P3-512 512GBBench 75%, 2,855 samples	3x
ShanDianZhe-128G 128GBBench 48%, 38 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16