Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 08:15
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 224
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 550
51% 426 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (50 fps cap detected)
40.2% Average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 50.1
Parallax 39.7
41% 46.5 fps
MRender 44.2
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 49.6
39% 47.8 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 840 832 463 55 89 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1340
Write 934
Mixed 864
SusWrite 392
196% 882 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62.2
215% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 220
258% 430 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 168%
Great: 209%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16
138GB free
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 60 60 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 61.2
Write 54.8
Mixed 36
SusWrite 59.8
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
54GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 9.7 7.6 8.6 9.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 16.3
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 14.2
22% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
24% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Adata 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 25.7
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 23.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback